Thursday, July 28, 2016

Red Scare

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare

A "Red Scare" is the promotion of fear of a potential rise of communism or radical leftism. In the United States, the First Red Scare was about worker (socialist) revolution and political radicalism. The Second Red Scare was focused on national and foreign communists influencing society, infiltrating the federal government, or both.


The Red Scare (1919–1920)[edit]

Main article: First Red Scare
The first Red Scare began following the Bolshevik Russian Revolution of 1917 and the intensely patriotic years of World War I as anarchist and left-wing social agitation aggravated national, social, and political tensions. Political scientist, and former member of the Communist Party Murray B. Levin wrote that the Red Scare was "a nationwide anti-radical hysteria provoked by a mounting fear and anxiety that a Bolshevik revolution in America was imminent—a revolution that would change Church, home, marriage, civility, and the American way of Life."[1] Newspapers exacerbated those political fears into anti-foreign sentiment because varieties of radical anarchism were becoming popular as possible solutions to poverty, often by recent European immigrants (cf. hyphenated-Americans). When the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) backed several labor strikes in 1916 and 1917, the press portrayed them as "radical threats to American society" inspired by "left-wing, foreign agents provocateurs." Those on the side of the IWW claim that the press "misrepresented legitimate labor strikes" as "crimes against society," "conspiracies against the government," and "plots to establish communism."[2] Opponents, on the other hand, saw these as an extension of the radical, anarchist foundations of the IWW, which contends that all workers should be united as a social class and that capitalism and the wage system should be abolished.[3]

A bomb blast badly damaged the residence of Attorney General Mitchell Palmer in the spring of 1919.
In April 1919, authorities discovered a plot for mailing 36 bombs to prominent members of the U.S. political and economic establishmentJ. P. Morgan Jr.John D. RockefellerSupreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell HolmesU.S. Attorney General Alexander Mitchell Palmer, and immigration officials. On June 2, 1919, in eight cities, eight bombs simultaneously exploded. One target was the Washington, D.C., house of U.S. Attorney General Palmer, where the explosion killed the bomber, who evidence indicated was an Italian-American radical from PhiladelphiaPennsylvania. Afterwards, Palmer ordered the U.S. Justice Department to launch the Palmer Raids (1919–21).[4]
Yet, in 1918, before the bombings, President Woodrow Wilson had pressured the Congress to legislate the anti-anarchist Sedition Act of 1918 to protect wartime morale by deporting putatively undesirable political people. Law professor David D. Cole reports that President Wilson’s "federal government consistently targeted alien radicals, deporting them ... for their speech or associations, making little effort to distinguish terrorists from ideological dissidents.”[4]
Initially, the press praised the raids; The Washington Post said, "There is no time to waste on hairsplitting over [the] infringement of liberty", and The New York Times said the injuries inflicted upon the arrested were "souvenirs of the new attitude of aggressiveness which had been assumed by the Federal agents against Reds and suspected-Reds."[5] In the event, the Palmer Raids were criticized as unconstitutional by twelve publicly prominent lawyers, including (future Supreme Court Justice) Felix Frankfurter, who published A Report on the Illegal Practices of The United States Department of Justice, documenting systematic violations of the FourthFifthSixth, and Eighth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution via Palmer-authorized “illegal acts” and “wanton violence”. Defensively, Palmer then warned that a government-deposing left-wing revolution would begin on 1 May 1920 — May Day, the International Workers’ Day. When it failed to happen, he was ridiculed and lost much credibility. Strengthening the legal criticism of Palmer was that fewer than 600 deportations were substantiated with evidence, out of the thousands of resident aliens arrested and deported. In July 1920, Palmer’s once-promising Democratic Party bid for the U.S. presidency failed.[6] Wall Street was bombed on September 2, 1920, near Federal Hall and the JP Morgan Bank. Although both anarchists and Communists were suspected as being responsible for the bombing, ultimately no individuals were indicted for the bombing in which 38 died and 141 were injured.[7]
In 1919–20, several states enacted "criminal syndicalism" laws outlawing advocacy of violence in effecting and securing social change. The restrictions included free speech limitations.[8] Passage of these laws, in turn, provoked aggressive police investigation of the accused persons, their jailing, and deportation for being suspected of being either communist or left-wing. Regardless of ideological gradation, the Red Scare did not distinguish between communismanarchismsocialism, or social democracy.[9]

Second Red Scare (1947–57)[edit]

Main article: McCarthyism
The second Red Scare occurred after World War II (1939–45), and was popularly known as "McCarthyism" after its most famous supporter, Senator Joseph McCarthy. McCarthyism coincided with increased popular fear of communist espionage consequent to a Soviet Eastern Europe, the Berlin Blockade (1948–49), the Chinese Civil War, the confessions of spying for the Soviet Union given by several high-ranking U.S. government officials, and the Korean War.

Internal causes of communist fear[edit]

The events of the late 1940s—the trial of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, the Iron Curtain (1945–1991) around Eastern Europe, and the Soviet Union’s nuclear weapon—surprised the American public, influencing popular opinion about U.S. National Security, that, in turn, connected to fear of the Soviet Union hydrogen-bombing the United States, and fear of the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA). In Canada, the 1946 Kellock–Taschereau Commission investigated espionage after top secret documents concerning RDXradar and other weapons were handed over to the Soviets by a domestic spy-ring.[10] At theHouse Un-American Activities Committee, former CPUSA members and NKVD spies, Elizabeth Bentley and Whittaker Chambers, testified that Soviet spies and communist sympathizers had penetrated the U.S. government before, during and after World War II. Other U.S. citizen spies confessed, some with pride, to their acts of espionage in situations where the statute of limitations on prosecuting them had run out. In 1949, anti–communist fear, and fear of American traitors, was aggravated by the Chinese Communists winning the Chinese Civil War against the Western-sponsored Kuomintang, their founding of the People's Republic of China, and later Chinese intervention in the Korean War (1950–53) against U.S. ally South Korea.
A few of the events during the red scare were also due to a power struggle between J. Edgar Hoover and the Central Intelligence Agency. Hoover had instigated and aided some of the investigations of members of the CIA with "leftist" history, like Cord Meyer.[11] This conflict could also be traced back to the conflict between Hoover and William J. Donovan, going back to the first Red Scare, but especially during World War II. Donovan ran the OSS (CIA's predecessor). They had differing opinions on the nature of the alliance with the Soviet Union, conflicts over jurisdiction, conflicts of personality, the OSS hiring of communists and criminals as agents, etc.[12]

History[edit]

By the 1930s, communism had become an attractive economic ideology among some in the United States, particularly among labor leaders and the intelligentsia. At its zenith in 1939, the CPUSA had some 50,000 members.[13] In 1940, soon after World War II began in Europe, the U.S. Congress legislated the Alien Registration Act (aka the Smith Act, 18 USC § 2385) making it a crime to "knowingly or willfully advocate, abet, advise or teach the duty, necessity, desirability or propriety of overthrowing the Government of the United States or of any State by force or violence, or for anyone to organize any association which teaches, advises or encourages such an overthrow, or for anyone to become a member of or to affiliate with any such association"—and required Federal registration of all foreign nationals. Although principally deployed against communists, the Smith Act was also used against right-wing political threats such as the German-American Bund, and the perceived racial disloyalty of the Japanese-American population, (cf. hyphenated-Americans).
In 1941, after Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union, the CPUSA's official position became pro-war, opposing labor strikes in the weapons industry and supporting the U.S. war effort against the Axis Powers. With the slogan "Communism is Twentieth-Century Americanism", the chairman, Earl Browder, advertised the CPUSA's integration to the political mainstream.[14] In contrast, the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party opposed U.S. participation in the war and supported labor strikes, even in the war-effort industry. For this reason, James P. Cannon and other SWP leaders were convicted per the Smith Act.
In March 1947, President Harry S. Truman signed Executive Order 9835, creating the "Federal Employees Loyalty Program" establishing political-loyalty review boards who determined the "Americanism" of Federal Government employees, and recommended termination of those who had confessed to spying for the Soviet Union, as well as some suspected of being "Un-American". It also was the template for several state legislatures' loyalty acts, such as California's Levering Act. The House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) and the committees of Senator Joseph McCarthy (R.Wisc.) conducted character investigations of "American communists" (actual and alleged), and their roles in (real and imaginary) espionage, propaganda, and subversion favoring the Soviet Union—in the process revealing the extraordinary breadth of the Soviet spy network in infiltrating the federal government; the process also launched the successful political career of Richard Nixon, andRobert F. Kennedy,[15] as well as that of Joseph McCarthy. McCarthy, a freshman Senator who died soon thereafter, realized little political gain from the process.
Senator McCarran introduced the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950 that was passed by the U.S. Congress and which modified a great deal of law to restrict civil liberties in the name of security. President Truman declared the act a "mockery of the Bill of Rights" and a "long step toward totalitarianism" because it represented a government restriction on the freedom of opinion. He vetoed the act but his veto was overridden by Congress.[16] Much of the bill eventually was repealed.
The Second Red Scare profoundly altered the temper of American society. Its later characterization as anti-intellectual may be seen as contributory to the popularity of anti-communist espionage (My Son John, 1950) and science fiction movies (The Thing From Another World, 1951) with stories and themes of the infiltration, subversion, invasion, and destruction of American society by un–American thought and inhuman beings. Even a baseball team, the Cincinnati Reds, temporarily renamed themselves the "Cincinnati Redlegs" to avoid the money-losing and career-ruining connotations inherent in being ball-playing "Reds" (communists).
In 1995, the American government revealed details of the Venona Project which gave indication of intelligence gathering by Americans for the Soviet Union from 1940 through 1980.[17][18]


A Dire Warning " I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America," "The abyss from which there is no return" August 17, 1975 Senator Frank Church appeared on NBC's Meet the Press "

On August 17, 1975 Senator Frank Church appeared on NBC's Meet the Press, and discussed the NSA, without mentioning it by name: 

["The abyss from which there is no return"] The Intelligence Gathering Debate -  https://youtu.be/YAG1N4a84Dk   via @YouTube

Reports of the Church Committee contain information on formation, operation, and abuses of U.S. intelligence agencies. http://www.maryferrell.org/php/showlist.php?docset=1014

tp://

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 

Church Committee:  United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank



Results of the investigation
On August 17, 1975 Senator Frank Church appeared on NBC's Meet the Press, and discussed the NSA, without mentioning it by name:

“              In the need to develop a capacity to know what potential enemies are doing, the United States government has perfected a technological capability that enables us to monitor the messages that go through the air. (...) Now, that is necessary and important to the United States as we look abroad at enemies or potential enemies. We must know, at the same time, that capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left such is the capability to monitor everything—telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn't matter. There would be no place to hide.
If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology. (...)

I don't want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.[9][10]






Saturday, July 16, 2016

The Day After Tomorrow Might Kinda, Sorta Come True and What’s going on in the North Atlantic?

The Day After Tomorrow Might Kinda, Sorta Come True 

Published in: Future Tense THE CITIZEN'S GUIDE TO THE FUTURE By Eric Holthaus MARCH 23 2015

“In the 2004 blockbuster The Day After Tomorrow, abrupt climate change plunges the world into chaos. According to new research published Monday, the idea that underpins the film’s plot—that rapid Arctic ice melt could cause dramatic changes to the global climate system—just got one step closer to reality.”
“Of particular concern are the profound changes happening in the Greenland ice sheet: It appears that the massive amount of freshwater from melting Greenland glaciers has now begun to slow the ocean’s circulating currents.”



What’s going on in the North Atlantic?

Filed under: Climate Science — stefan @ 23 March 2015

"The North Atlantic between Newfoundland and Ireland is practically the only region of the world that has defied global warming and even cooled. Last winter there even was the coldest on record – while globally it was the hottest on record. Our recent study (Rahmstorf et al. 2015) attributes this to a weakening of the Gulf Stream System, which is apparently unique in the last thousand years."


Saturday, July 9, 2016

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said the committee would send FBI a referral to open a new investigation into whether Clinton lied under oath

Published on July 7, 2016
FBI Director James Comey is testifying this morning before the House Oversight Committee on the decision not to charge Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.
Comey said Tuesday Clinton was "extremely careless" with classified information, but recommended that the Justice Department not pursue criminal charges.
Committee chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) questioned Comey first, asking if the FBI investigated Clinton for possibly lying to Congress about her emails in past testimony.
"Did Hillary Clinton lie under oath?" Chaffetz asked.
Comey answered that he had "no basis to conclude" that she lied to the FBI in her testimony.

Chaffetz noted that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) asked Clinton, under oath, about classified material in her emails and she maintained that "there was nothing marked classified in my emails either sent or received."

On Tuesday, Comey said there were 110 emails found to be classified at the time they were sent on Clinton's server.

Chaffetz pressed Comey on whether the FBI investigated Clinton's statements under oath on her emails.

Comey said there was no "referral" to investigate her statements to Congress.

"Do you need a referral from Congress?" Chaffetz asked.

"Sure do," said Comey.

"You'll have one," Chaffetz answered with a smile. "You'll have one in the next few hours."

Now please watch the whole above sequence on YouTube:
Chaffetz Tells Comey He'll Ask FBI to Investigate Hillary's Statements Under Oath

ALSO SEE BELOW: FBI Director James Comey complete testimony On CSPAN

Hillary Clinton Email Investigation, Part 1 FBI Director James Comey testified at a hearing on the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email servers, as well as the decision to not recommend criminal charges against her. Director Comey defended the FBI’s decision not to recommend filing criminal charges and responded to questions from Republicans on Hillary Clinton’s honesty. 

JULY 7, 2016 LIVE ON CSPAN: FBI Director James Comey testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on the FBI's investigation http://www.c-span.org/video/?412315-1/fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-hillary-clinton-email-probe&live

Friday, July 8, 2016

In Remberance of Sam Ervin "A Plain Old Country Lawyer" Thank You! (Wish You Were Here)

Sam Ervin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Ervin gained lasting fame through his stewardship of the Senate Select Committee to Investigate Campaign Practices, also known as the Senate Watergate Committee, from the 1972 presidential election.(that led to the resignation in 1974 of President Richard Nixon)"
Sam Ervin
Sam Ervin.jpg
United States Senator
from North Carolina
In office
June 5, 1954 – December 31, 1974
Preceded byClyde R. Hoey
Succeeded byRobert B. Morgan
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from North Carolina's 10th district
In office
January 22, 1946 – January 3, 1947
Preceded byJoseph W. Ervin
Succeeded byHamilton C. Jones
Personal details
BornSamuel James Ervin, Jr.
September 27, 1896
Morganton, North Carolina
DiedApril 23, 1985 (aged 88)
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
NationalityAmerican
Political partyDemocratic
Spouse(s)Margaret Bell Ervin
Alma materUniversity of North CarolinaHarvard Law School
ReligionPresbyterian
Samuel James "Sam" Ervin, Jr. (September 27, 1896 – April 23, 1985) was an American politician. A Democrat, he served as a U.S. Senator from North Carolina from 1954 to 1974. A native of Morganton, he liked to call himself a "country lawyer," and often told humorous stories in his Southern drawl.[1] During his Senate career, Ervin was a legal defender of the Jim Crow laws and racial segregation, as the South's constitutional expert during the congressional debates on civil rights.[2] Unexpectedly, he became a liberal hero for his support of civil liberties. He is remembered for his work in the investigation committees that brought down Senator Joseph McCarthy in 1954 and especially his investigation in 1972 and 1973 of the Watergate scandal that led to the resignation in 1974 of President Richard Nixon.

Green party's Jill Stein invites Bernie Sanders to take over ticket

Green party's Jill Stein invites Bernie Sanders to take over ticket 

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

We Live in Interesting Times

With #BernieOrBust voters in numbers that count
Add #NeverHillary voters and the numbers mount
Clearing Hillary of criminal endeavors
FBI Director Comey did Hillary no favors

Top Secret Documents mishandled nonetheless
Labeled Hillary's actions extremely careless
Hillary should know better, but no intent
Definition of gross negligence extremely bent

But Comey made it clear nontheless
In similar circumstances charges will press  
It’s up to the voters to render a verdict
Four Parties to choose with DNC the reject

Disunity among the red and the blues
Spit two parties controlling political views
Two oligarch parties seem to be rejected
Two anti-establishment parties accepted